<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mesothelioma Cancer BLOG - Cappolino, Dodd &#038; Krebs, LLP &#187; Mesothelioma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/category/mesothelioma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com</link>
	<description>Information provided by mesothelioma lawyers about mesothelioma cancer, asbestos exposure, recent legislation, what to do if you are a victim, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>This is what happens when corporate influence goes unchecked</title>
		<link>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2010/07/09/heres-what-happens-when-corporate-influence-goes-unchecked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2010/07/09/heres-what-happens-when-corporate-influence-goes-unchecked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 20:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Stone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/?p=5040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>To those who say that government isn&#8217;t the answer to our problems, we offer this rather egregious list from Move On of the top-10 reasons we need more — not less — governmental oversight.</p>

<p>Exxon Mobil made billions in profits, and yet paid not one dime in federal income taxes in 2009.
The 2005 energy bill had [...]</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To those who say that government isn&#8217;t the answer to our problems, we offer this rather egregious list from Move On of the top-10 reasons we need more — not less — governmental oversight.</p>

<ol>
<li><p>Exxon Mobil made billions in profits, and yet paid <em>not one dime</em> in federal income taxes in 2009.</p></li>
<li><p>The 2005 energy bill had a little known provision, commonly called the Halliburton Loophole, which exempted natural gas drilling from the Clean Water Act. The result? Water so contaminated that you can light it on fire.</p></li>
<li><p>Massey Energy was cited more than 2400 times for safety violations in its mines, but chose not to fix potentially lethal problems because low penalties meant it was cheaper to simply keep paying the fines. This spring, 29 miners were killed in an underground explosion at a Massey mine in West Virginia.</p></li>
<li><p>Michael Taylor was the FDA official who approved the use of Monsanto&#8217;s Bovine Growth Hormone in dairy cows (even though it&#8217;s banned in most countries and linked to cancer). After approving it, he left the FDA—to work for Monsanto. Until last year, when he moved back to the government—as President Obama&#8217;s &#8220;Food Safety Czar.&#8221; No joke.</p></li>
<li><p>Internal Toyota documents outline how the company was successful in limiting regulator actions in the recalls last year—saving hundreds of millions while the death toll continued to climb.</p></li>
<li><p>GE and its lobbyists—including 33 former government employees—have successfully lobbied Congress to override Defense Department requests to cancel a GE contract to work on a new engine for the Joint Strike Fighter jet. GE will need $2.9 billion to finish the project.</p></li>
<li><p>Top executives at 9 big banks including Citibank, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley paid themselves over $20 billion in bonuses just weeks after taxpayers bailed them out to the tune of 700 billion dollars.</p></li>
<li><p>During the waning days of the Bush administration, officials responded to a long-term lobbying campaign by pre-empting product liability lawsuits for dozens of entire industries. They bypassed Congress entirely and rewrote rules ranging from seatbelt manufacturing regulations to prescription drug safety.</p></li>
<li><p>Sunscreen manufacturers including Johnson &amp; Johnson and Schering-Plough, in the interest of profits, are opposing an FDA proposal requiring full reporting on sunscreen labels. The New York Times just confirmed that current SPF ratings don&#8217;t even measure sun rays that cause cancer.</p></li>
<li><p>And of course BP—a company with a record of 760 drilling safety and environmental violations—was granted safety waivers in order to operate the deepwater drilling rig that ultimately created the worst environmental disaster in US history.</p></li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2010/07/09/heres-what-happens-when-corporate-influence-goes-unchecked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Companies knew asbestos was dangerous in the 1930s</title>
		<link>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2010/06/23/companies-knew-asbestos-was-dangerous-in-the-1930s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2010/06/23/companies-knew-asbestos-was-dangerous-in-the-1930s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 19:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Stone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alcoa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asbestosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/?p=5037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In 1933, the Johns-Manville Company settled with an attorney on behalf of 11 former Manville employees, all asbestosis victims. The attorney received $30,000 for the victims, in exchange for a written promise that he would not “directly or indirectly participate in the bringing of new actions against the Corporation.”</p>

<p>This fact did not come to light [...]</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1933, the Johns-Manville Company settled with an attorney on behalf of 11 former Manville employees, all asbestosis victims. The attorney received $30,000 for the victims, in exchange for a written promise that he would not “directly or indirectly participate in the bringing of new actions against the Corporation.”</p>

<p>This fact did not come to light for more than 45 years. In the meantime, the company was able successfully to avoid damage suits. Had the public known about this settlement, it is likely that the hazards of asbestos would have come to light decades earlier.</p>

<p>Companies like Alcoa that used asbestos in its daily manufacturing processes have denied knowing that asbestos exposure could be a danger to those who worked closely with the mineral. In fact, these companies have managed to set the late-1960s as the benchmark for when they could have known about the dangers of asbestos &#8212; nearly 40 years later!</p>

<p>Asbestos has been linked to mesothelioma, an aggressive and deadly form of cancer. It is difficult to diagnose and symptoms often take 20-30 years to manifest. Usually, by the time symptoms show up, it is too late to save the patient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2010/06/23/companies-knew-asbestos-was-dangerous-in-the-1930s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Major new study of Libby asbestos contamination begins</title>
		<link>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2010/06/17/major-new-study-of-libby-asbestos-contamination-begins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2010/06/17/major-new-study-of-libby-asbestos-contamination-begins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Stone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asbestosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vermiculite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[W.R. Grace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[W.R. Grace & Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zonolite]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/?p=5032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you attended  Montana’s Libby High School between 1950 and 1999, and then moved away,  asbestos researchers are looking for you.</p>

<p>Researchers are asking these people to submit to tests to help determine the extent of contamination caused by asbestos mining and processing in the northwestern Montana town. Libby has emerged as the deadliest Superfund [...]</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you attended  Montana’s Libby High School between 1950 and 1999, and then moved away,  asbestos researchers are looking for you.</p>

<p><span id="more-23827"> </span></p>

<p>Researchers are asking these people to submit to tests to help determine the extent of contamination caused by asbestos mining and processing in the northwestern Montana town. Libby has emerged as the deadliest Superfund site in the nation.</p>

<p>The study by the Center for Asbestos Related Disease will focus on low-level childhood asbestos exposure, compare exposure of Libby asbestos to that of more common commercial forms, and examine the presence of autoimmune disorders like lupus.</p>

<p style="text-align: left;">Other potential disorders include asbestosis and mesothelioma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2010/06/17/major-new-study-of-libby-asbestos-contamination-begins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
