<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Asbestos Exposure and Mesothelioma Attorneys &#187; Lung Cancer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/category/lung-cancer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com</link>
	<description>Helping victims of asbestos exposure with mesothelioma and other cancers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:37:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Early Detection is Key in Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2012/02/early-detection-is-key-in-mesothelioma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2012/02/early-detection-is-key-in-mesothelioma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mikedavidson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lung Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma attorneys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/?p=5601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The key to increased life expectancy when battling extremely aggressive cancers like mesothelioma is early detection. Unfortunately, researchers have yet to develop an effective lung cancer screening tool.</p>
<p>While breast cancer has the mammogram and prostate cancer has the PSA, lung cancer does not have an equivalent test for detection. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) identifies chest x-rays, CT scans, PET scans and the bronchoscopy as tests used to diagnose lung cancer, but these tests are only effective after a patient has presented worsening respiratory symptoms.</p>
<p>Patients with mesothelioma often have symptoms such as a persistent cough, shortness of breath, fatigue and wheezing, similar to other respiratory illnesses. Typically, when a patient first exhibits these symptoms, doctors first treat them for a respiratory infection. They only test for cancer later. This leads to a late diagnosis, when the disease is already causing life-threatening complications.</p>
<p>Studies are underway to find an effective lung cancer and mesothelioma screening tool. Some researchers have developed tests to detect circulating tumor cells. Other tests include Cornell’s “glowing dots” that would attach to cancer cells and glow during a PET scan, and an electronic nose to detect mesothelioma in an exhaled breath.</p>
<p>There is hope that someday soon research will catch up with the dire need of future <a title="Link to information about mesothelioma" href="http://www.asbestoslaw.com/mesothelioma_overview.html">mesothelioma</a> sufferers for early detection.</p>
<p><strong>Cappolino Dodd Krebs, LLP – </strong><a title="Link to meet our mesothelioma attorneys" href="http://www.asbestoslaw.com/mesothelioma_lawyers.html">mesothelioma attorneys</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key to increased life expectancy when battling extremely aggressive cancers like mesothelioma is early detection. Unfortunately, researchers have yet to develop an effective lung cancer screening tool.</p>
<p>While breast cancer has the mammogram and prostate cancer has the PSA, lung cancer does not have an equivalent test for detection. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) identifies chest x-rays, CT scans, PET scans and the bronchoscopy as tests used to diagnose lung cancer, but these tests are only effective after a patient has presented worsening respiratory symptoms.</p>
<p>Patients with mesothelioma often have symptoms such as a persistent cough, shortness of breath, fatigue and wheezing, similar to other respiratory illnesses. Typically, when a patient first exhibits these symptoms, doctors first treat them for a respiratory infection. They only test for cancer later. This leads to a late diagnosis, when the disease is already causing life-threatening complications.</p>
<p>Studies are underway to find an effective lung cancer and mesothelioma screening tool. Some researchers have developed tests to detect circulating tumor cells. Other tests include Cornell’s “glowing dots” that would attach to cancer cells and glow during a PET scan, and an electronic nose to detect mesothelioma in an exhaled breath.</p>
<p>There is hope that someday soon research will catch up with the dire need of future <a title="Link to information about mesothelioma" href="http://www.asbestoslaw.com/mesothelioma_overview.html">mesothelioma</a> sufferers for early detection.</p>
<p><strong>Cappolino Dodd Krebs, LLP – </strong><a title="Link to meet our mesothelioma attorneys" href="http://www.asbestoslaw.com/mesothelioma_lawyers.html">mesothelioma attorneys</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2012/02/early-detection-is-key-in-mesothelioma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mesothelioma and Chinese Textile Workers</title>
		<link>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2011/08/mesothelioma-and-chinese-textile-workers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2011/08/mesothelioma-and-chinese-textile-workers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>holland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[asbestos exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lung Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[textile industries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/?p=5436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to Mesothelioma.com, a report published in the journal Lung Cancer states that textile industries that exposed workers to asbestos in the past created a high risk for workers of developing mesothelioma and other lung cancers. The authors of the report followed the employment and health statuses of 577 Chinese textile workers who encountered asbestos in chrysolite, a mineral fiber, from 1972 to 2008. Out of 259 worker deaths, 53 died of lung cancer and two died of mesothelioma. The workers with high levels of exposure to asbestos had double the chances of dying of lung cancer compared to those workers with low levels of exposure. China has a high use of asbestos and fewer safety regulations in place, and the World Bank recently warned the country that chronic non-communicable disease, including lung cancer, account for over 80 percent of deaths in China.</p>
<p>In America, occupational asbestos exposure usually indicates experience in the construction business or shipyard workers. However, this article shows that <a title="Link to more information about asbestos exposure" href="http://www.asbestoslaw.com/asbestos_exposure.html">asbestos exposure</a> in the textile industry continues to be a problem. Thankfully, use of asbestos in American textile factories has largely ended, but we must continue to be diligent in making others aware of the harmful effects of asbestos exposure.</p>
<p>Cappolino Dodd Krebs LLP&#8211;<a title="Link to information about Cappolino Dodd Krebs LLP, mesothelioma attorneys" href="http://www.asbestoslaw.com/mesothelioma_law_firm_attorneys.html">Mesothelioma attorneys</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Mesothelioma.com, a report published in the journal Lung Cancer states that textile industries that exposed workers to asbestos in the past created a high risk for workers of developing mesothelioma and other lung cancers. The authors of the report followed the employment and health statuses of 577 Chinese textile workers who encountered asbestos in chrysolite, a mineral fiber, from 1972 to 2008. Out of 259 worker deaths, 53 died of lung cancer and two died of mesothelioma. The workers with high levels of exposure to asbestos had double the chances of dying of lung cancer compared to those workers with low levels of exposure. China has a high use of asbestos and fewer safety regulations in place, and the World Bank recently warned the country that chronic non-communicable disease, including lung cancer, account for over 80 percent of deaths in China.</p>
<p>In America, occupational asbestos exposure usually indicates experience in the construction business or shipyard workers. However, this article shows that <a title="Link to more information about asbestos exposure" href="http://www.asbestoslaw.com/asbestos_exposure.html">asbestos exposure</a> in the textile industry continues to be a problem. Thankfully, use of asbestos in American textile factories has largely ended, but we must continue to be diligent in making others aware of the harmful effects of asbestos exposure.</p>
<p>Cappolino Dodd Krebs LLP&#8211;<a title="Link to information about Cappolino Dodd Krebs LLP, mesothelioma attorneys" href="http://www.asbestoslaw.com/mesothelioma_law_firm_attorneys.html">Mesothelioma attorneys</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2011/08/mesothelioma-and-chinese-textile-workers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shortage of Drugs Used to Treat Mesothelioma</title>
		<link>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2011/08/shortage-of-drugs-used-to-treat-mesothelioma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2011/08/shortage-of-drugs-used-to-treat-mesothelioma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 14:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>holland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lung Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug shortages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma attorneys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/?p=5424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The list of drug shortages reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) now includes cisplatin, paclitaxel and doxorubicin, all of which doctors can prescribe to treat <a title="Link to information about mesothelioma" href="http://www.asbestoslaw.com/mesothelioma_overview.html">mesothelioma</a> and lung cancer. The FDA states that the reason for the shortages includes quality problems in the manufacturing process.</p>
<p>According to Mesothelioma Help, however, one oncologist states that the drug shortages result from pharmaceutical companies who wish to increase their profit margins by focusing on drugs that will make more money. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) wants to protect those suffering from mesothelioma who may not be able to receive their treatments due to drug shortages by pushing a bill that would require drug companies to tell the FDA when making changes to drug production.</p>
<p>Obviously, there is still more work to be done. A Drug Shortages Summit in 2010 looked at developing plans to stop disruptions in patient care caused by drug shortages and shedding light on the harm that the shortages cause patients. The summit also presented the possibility of providing incentives to drug companies that produce important products, such as mesothelioma drugs, so that there would be safeguards against shortages or even discontinuance. The fight against deadly cancers such as mesothelioma can only move on with patients&#8217; continued access to medications they need to survive.</p>
<p>Cappolino Dodd Krebs LLP&#8211;<a title="Link to information about Cappolino Dodd Krebs LLP, Mesothelioma attorneys" href="http://www.asbestoslaw.com/mesothelioma_law_firm_attorneys.html">Mesothelioma attorneys</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The list of drug shortages reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) now includes cisplatin, paclitaxel and doxorubicin, all of which doctors can prescribe to treat <a title="Link to information about mesothelioma" href="http://www.asbestoslaw.com/mesothelioma_overview.html">mesothelioma</a> and lung cancer. The FDA states that the reason for the shortages includes quality problems in the manufacturing process.</p>
<p>According to Mesothelioma Help, however, one oncologist states that the drug shortages result from pharmaceutical companies who wish to increase their profit margins by focusing on drugs that will make more money. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) wants to protect those suffering from mesothelioma who may not be able to receive their treatments due to drug shortages by pushing a bill that would require drug companies to tell the FDA when making changes to drug production.</p>
<p>Obviously, there is still more work to be done. A Drug Shortages Summit in 2010 looked at developing plans to stop disruptions in patient care caused by drug shortages and shedding light on the harm that the shortages cause patients. The summit also presented the possibility of providing incentives to drug companies that produce important products, such as mesothelioma drugs, so that there would be safeguards against shortages or even discontinuance. The fight against deadly cancers such as mesothelioma can only move on with patients&#8217; continued access to medications they need to survive.</p>
<p>Cappolino Dodd Krebs LLP&#8211;<a title="Link to information about Cappolino Dodd Krebs LLP, Mesothelioma attorneys" href="http://www.asbestoslaw.com/mesothelioma_law_firm_attorneys.html">Mesothelioma attorneys</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2011/08/shortage-of-drugs-used-to-treat-mesothelioma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Couple Names 57 Defendants in Asbestos Related Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2011/06/couple-names-57-defendants-in-asbestos-related-lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2011/06/couple-names-57-defendants-in-asbestos-related-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lung Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/?p=5311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to the West Virginia Record, a Kentucky couple has named fifty seven defendants in an asbestos related lawsuit. Charles E. Gipson and his wife have sued fifty seven companies they claim are responsible for Charles’ diagnosis with lung cancer. Gipson claims the defendants are responsible because for his <a href="http://www.asbestoslaw.com/asbestos_exposure.html" title="Link to information about exposure to asbestos">exposure to asbestos</a> as he inhaled fibers during his employment, causing him to develop lung cancer.</p>
<p>According to the suit, Gipson smoked cigarettes from 1960 until 1995 and was a member of the United States Army from 1948 until 1951. Gipson and his wife are seeking a jury trial to resolve all issues involved. A <a href="http://www.asbestoslaw.com/mesothelioma_lawyers.html" title="Link to information about mesothelioma lawyer">Mesothelioma lawyer</a> can answer your questions if you have been exposed to toxic asbestos fibers during your employment.</p>
<p>The couple is suing the following defendants upon theories of negligence, contaminated buildings, breach of express/implied warranty, strict liability, intentional tort, conspiracy, misrepresentation and post-sale duty to warn:</p>
<p>3M Company; A.O. Smith Corporation; A.W. Chesterton Company; Ashland Oil, Inc.; Aurora Pump Company; Brand Insulations, Inc.; BW IP, Inc.; Certainteed Corporation; Chicago Pump Company; Cleaver-Brooks Company, Inc.; Crane Co.; Dravo Corporation; Eaton Electrical, Inc.; Flowserve FSD Corporation; Flowserve US, Inc.; Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation; FMC Corporation; Gardner Denver, Inc.; General Electric Company; Goulds Pumps, Inc.; Grinnell Corporation; Honeywell International; Honeywell, Inc.; Howden North America, Inc.; IMO Industries, Inc.; Industrial Holdings Corporation; Ingersoll-Rand Company; ITT Corporation; Lockheed Martin Corporation; McJunkin Corporation; Metropolitan Life Insurance Company; Nagle Pumps, Inc.; Nitro Industrial Coverings, Inc.; Ohio Valley Insulating Company, Inc.; Owens-Illinois, Inc.; Pneumo Abex Corporation; Rapid American Corporation; Riley Stoker Corporation; Rockwell Automation, Inc.; Roper Pump Company; Rust International, Inc.; Square D Company; State Electric Supply Company; Sterling Fluid Systems (USA), LLC; Stockham Valves & Fittings; Taco, Inc.; Tasco Insulations, Inc.; Trane U.S. Inc.; UB West Virginia, Inc.; Uniroyal, Inc.; United Engineers &#038; Constructors, Inc.; Viacom, Inc.; Viad Corporation; Vimasco Corporation; WABCO Company; West Virginia Electric Supply Company; and Zurn Industries, LLC.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the West Virginia Record, a Kentucky couple has named fifty seven defendants in an asbestos related lawsuit. Charles E. Gipson and his wife have sued fifty seven companies they claim are responsible for Charles’ diagnosis with lung cancer. Gipson claims the defendants are responsible because for his <a href="http://www.asbestoslaw.com/asbestos_exposure.html" title="Link to information about exposure to asbestos">exposure to asbestos</a> as he inhaled fibers during his employment, causing him to develop lung cancer.</p>
<p>According to the suit, Gipson smoked cigarettes from 1960 until 1995 and was a member of the United States Army from 1948 until 1951. Gipson and his wife are seeking a jury trial to resolve all issues involved. A <a href="http://www.asbestoslaw.com/mesothelioma_lawyers.html" title="Link to information about mesothelioma lawyer">Mesothelioma lawyer</a> can answer your questions if you have been exposed to toxic asbestos fibers during your employment.</p>
<p>The couple is suing the following defendants upon theories of negligence, contaminated buildings, breach of express/implied warranty, strict liability, intentional tort, conspiracy, misrepresentation and post-sale duty to warn:</p>
<p>3M Company; A.O. Smith Corporation; A.W. Chesterton Company; Ashland Oil, Inc.; Aurora Pump Company; Brand Insulations, Inc.; BW IP, Inc.; Certainteed Corporation; Chicago Pump Company; Cleaver-Brooks Company, Inc.; Crane Co.; Dravo Corporation; Eaton Electrical, Inc.; Flowserve FSD Corporation; Flowserve US, Inc.; Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation; FMC Corporation; Gardner Denver, Inc.; General Electric Company; Goulds Pumps, Inc.; Grinnell Corporation; Honeywell International; Honeywell, Inc.; Howden North America, Inc.; IMO Industries, Inc.; Industrial Holdings Corporation; Ingersoll-Rand Company; ITT Corporation; Lockheed Martin Corporation; McJunkin Corporation; Metropolitan Life Insurance Company; Nagle Pumps, Inc.; Nitro Industrial Coverings, Inc.; Ohio Valley Insulating Company, Inc.; Owens-Illinois, Inc.; Pneumo Abex Corporation; Rapid American Corporation; Riley Stoker Corporation; Rockwell Automation, Inc.; Roper Pump Company; Rust International, Inc.; Square D Company; State Electric Supply Company; Sterling Fluid Systems (USA), LLC; Stockham Valves & Fittings; Taco, Inc.; Tasco Insulations, Inc.; Trane U.S. Inc.; UB West Virginia, Inc.; Uniroyal, Inc.; United Engineers &#038; Constructors, Inc.; Viacom, Inc.; Viad Corporation; Vimasco Corporation; WABCO Company; West Virginia Electric Supply Company; and Zurn Industries, LLC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2011/06/couple-names-57-defendants-in-asbestos-related-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Radon Responsible for Lung Cancer Deaths, Low Survival Rate Found</title>
		<link>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2011/05/radon-responsible-for-lung-cancer-deaths-low-survival-rate-found/</link>
		<comments>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2011/05/radon-responsible-for-lung-cancer-deaths-low-survival-rate-found/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 12:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lung Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinogen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ionizing radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radon gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/?p=5254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to CBS Atlanta, lung cancer kills thousands of Americans each year. Smoking, radon and secondhand smoke have all been linked to the development of lung cancer. While treatable, the survival rates of lung cancer are one of the lowest. Between 11 and 15 percent of those diagnosed will live beyond five years. However, in many cases lung cancer is preventable.</p>
<p>The EPA estimates that 20,000 lung cancer deaths each year are radon-related. Radon is a form of ionizing radiation and is a proven carcinogen. Approximately 85% of radon-induced lung cancer patients die within 4-5 years of diagnosis.</p>
<p>Two studies have shown definite evidence of association between residential radon exposure and lung cancer. One study in North America combined data from several previous residential studies. Both studies confirmed the radon health risks predicted by occupational studies of underground miners who breathed radon for several years. Some researchers had questioned earlier whether occupational studies could be used to calculate risks from exposure to exposure to radon in the home environment.</p>
<p>The EPA’s former director of Indoor Environment Division said that the studies’ findings effectively end doubt about the risks of having radon in the home. Breathing even low levels of radon could lead to lung cancer, said Tom Kelly. </p>
<p>Dr. Michael Repacholi, coordinator of WHO’s Radiation and Environmental Health Unit said that radon poses a health risk to populations all over the world, but that the risk can be reduced. While radon health risks have received widespread attention, the carcinogen is the main source of exposure to ionizing radiation, and accounts to 50% of the public’s exposure to naturally-occurring sources of radiation, said Repacholi.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to CBS Atlanta, lung cancer kills thousands of Americans each year. Smoking, radon and secondhand smoke have all been linked to the development of lung cancer. While treatable, the survival rates of lung cancer are one of the lowest. Between 11 and 15 percent of those diagnosed will live beyond five years. However, in many cases lung cancer is preventable.</p>
<p>The EPA estimates that 20,000 lung cancer deaths each year are radon-related. Radon is a form of ionizing radiation and is a proven carcinogen. Approximately 85% of radon-induced lung cancer patients die within 4-5 years of diagnosis.</p>
<p>Two studies have shown definite evidence of association between residential radon exposure and lung cancer. One study in North America combined data from several previous residential studies. Both studies confirmed the radon health risks predicted by occupational studies of underground miners who breathed radon for several years. Some researchers had questioned earlier whether occupational studies could be used to calculate risks from exposure to exposure to radon in the home environment.</p>
<p>The EPA’s former director of Indoor Environment Division said that the studies’ findings effectively end doubt about the risks of having radon in the home. Breathing even low levels of radon could lead to lung cancer, said Tom Kelly. </p>
<p>Dr. Michael Repacholi, coordinator of WHO’s Radiation and Environmental Health Unit said that radon poses a health risk to populations all over the world, but that the risk can be reduced. While radon health risks have received widespread attention, the carcinogen is the main source of exposure to ionizing radiation, and accounts to 50% of the public’s exposure to naturally-occurring sources of radiation, said Repacholi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2011/05/radon-responsible-for-lung-cancer-deaths-low-survival-rate-found/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Early Smokers At Increased Risk of Developing Lung Cancer</title>
		<link>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2011/05/early-smokers-at-increased-risk-of-developing-lung-cancer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2011/05/early-smokers-at-increased-risk-of-developing-lung-cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 12:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lung Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigarette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smokers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/?p=5251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to Boomer Health &#038; Lifestyle, lung cancer risk is higher for those who start smoking early in their life. According to Dr. Otis Brawley, individuals who start smoking at an early age have an increased chance of developing lung cancer later in life. The Chief Medical Officer at the American Cancer Society said that the risk increases particularly in a person’s mid to late 50s and peaks in their late 70s. The number of cigarettes smoked daily and number of years a person spends smoking also add to the risk.</p>
<p>According to the doctor, one third of heavy smokers develop lung cancer. Research has shown that 15 to 20 out of every 100 patients diagnosed with lung cancer have had the bad habit most of their lives. Second hand smoke has lead to some of the diagnosis, while for some the cause is unknown.</p>
<p>Brawley cautions that smoking causes other health issues and not just lung cancer. The bad habit is known to cause 14 different cancers, including those of the head, neck, stomach, kidney, esophagus, pancreas, and bladder. It may also be linked to leukemia, ulcers, high blood pressure, diabetes, bronchitis, emphysema, osteoporosis and reproductive disorders.</p>
<p>A recent study has found that smokers of mentholated cigarettes are no more likely to develop lung cancer than other smokers. In fact, menthol smokers had a lower risk of developing lung cancer, according to a study published in the journal of the National Cancer Institute. The study found that mentholated cigarette smokers were about 12 times more likely to develop lung cancer, while non-menthol smokers had a 21 times the risk of developing the disease.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Boomer Health &#038; Lifestyle, lung cancer risk is higher for those who start smoking early in their life. According to Dr. Otis Brawley, individuals who start smoking at an early age have an increased chance of developing lung cancer later in life. The Chief Medical Officer at the American Cancer Society said that the risk increases particularly in a person’s mid to late 50s and peaks in their late 70s. The number of cigarettes smoked daily and number of years a person spends smoking also add to the risk.</p>
<p>According to the doctor, one third of heavy smokers develop lung cancer. Research has shown that 15 to 20 out of every 100 patients diagnosed with lung cancer have had the bad habit most of their lives. Second hand smoke has lead to some of the diagnosis, while for some the cause is unknown.</p>
<p>Brawley cautions that smoking causes other health issues and not just lung cancer. The bad habit is known to cause 14 different cancers, including those of the head, neck, stomach, kidney, esophagus, pancreas, and bladder. It may also be linked to leukemia, ulcers, high blood pressure, diabetes, bronchitis, emphysema, osteoporosis and reproductive disorders.</p>
<p>A recent study has found that smokers of mentholated cigarettes are no more likely to develop lung cancer than other smokers. In fact, menthol smokers had a lower risk of developing lung cancer, according to a study published in the journal of the National Cancer Institute. The study found that mentholated cigarette smokers were about 12 times more likely to develop lung cancer, while non-menthol smokers had a 21 times the risk of developing the disease.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2011/05/early-smokers-at-increased-risk-of-developing-lung-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Genome Sequencing May Be Used As a Cancer Diagnostic Tool</title>
		<link>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2011/04/genome-sequencing-may-be-used-as-a-cancer-diagnostic-tool/</link>
		<comments>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2011/04/genome-sequencing-may-be-used-as-a-cancer-diagnostic-tool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lung Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diagnosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early stage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treatment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/?p=5236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to Medical News Today, sequencing a <a href="http://asbestoslaw.com/">cancer</a> patient’s genome can be an effective diagnostic tool in aiding doctors to find the best treatment. Researchers from Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis published a study in the journal of the American Medical Association showing that genome sequencing can lead to effective cancer treatment.</p>
<p>In the first study conducted by the group, a 39-year-old female patient with leukemia had her genome sequenced which lead to a change in treatment. The sequencing showed doctors a novel genetic error which doctors used to recommend targeted chemotherapy instead of a cell transplant. The patient is now in remission after successful chemotherapy treatment. The patient’s oncologist said that sequencing the genome offered the doctors an opportunity to make the correct call in recommending further therapy instead of a significantly risky stem cell transplant.</p>
<p>The second study conducted by the same group sequenced the genome of a deceased 42-year old female patient who had developed breast and ovarian cancer. The sequence detected a new mutation in a gene known to considerably raise the risk of cancer. Her family was informed and subsequently advised to receive genetic counseling, which resulted in findings that the patient’s three offspring are at high risk of developing  cancer early on in life.</p>
<p>Genome sequencing could make a major difference in the lives of many cancer patients and their families. Both studies showed value in using genome sequencing as a diagnostic tool and perhaps even a cancer prevention method.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Medical News Today, sequencing a <a href="http://asbestoslaw.com/">cancer</a> patient’s genome can be an effective diagnostic tool in aiding doctors to find the best treatment. Researchers from Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis published a study in the journal of the American Medical Association showing that genome sequencing can lead to effective cancer treatment.</p>
<p>In the first study conducted by the group, a 39-year-old female patient with leukemia had her genome sequenced which lead to a change in treatment. The sequencing showed doctors a novel genetic error which doctors used to recommend targeted chemotherapy instead of a cell transplant. The patient is now in remission after successful chemotherapy treatment. The patient’s oncologist said that sequencing the genome offered the doctors an opportunity to make the correct call in recommending further therapy instead of a significantly risky stem cell transplant.</p>
<p>The second study conducted by the same group sequenced the genome of a deceased 42-year old female patient who had developed breast and ovarian cancer. The sequence detected a new mutation in a gene known to considerably raise the risk of cancer. Her family was informed and subsequently advised to receive genetic counseling, which resulted in findings that the patient’s three offspring are at high risk of developing  cancer early on in life.</p>
<p>Genome sequencing could make a major difference in the lives of many cancer patients and their families. Both studies showed value in using genome sequencing as a diagnostic tool and perhaps even a cancer prevention method.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2011/04/genome-sequencing-may-be-used-as-a-cancer-diagnostic-tool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study Finds Lack of Clinical Trials in Top Four Deadliest Cancers</title>
		<link>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2011/04/study-finds-lack-of-clinical-trials-in-top-four-deadliest-cancers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2011/04/study-finds-lack-of-clinical-trials-in-top-four-deadliest-cancers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lung Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinical trials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life expectancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/?p=5239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to Adelaide Now, a recently published study in the Medical Journal of Australia suggests that four of the five cancers that result in the greatest health crisis seriously lack critical trials. The study examined lung, colorectal, prostate and pancreatic cancers.</p>
<p>Rachel Dear, MD and lead researcher of the study said that 386 recent interventional cancer trials in Australia did not include a lot of the major cancers. About 24 were conducted on lung cancer, which is a cancer with the greatest impact of quality of life and life expectancy. Colorectal cancer had 21 trials, even though it is second in terms of life expectancy.</p>
<p>The study found that breast cancer was the most researched type of cancer. The Cancer Council said that clinical research for all types of cancer is necessary in order to find the best way to improve treatment for patients. The council said that <a href="http://asbestoslaw.com/">lung cancer</a> was the biggest killer and the most easily prevented type of cancer, followed by colorectal cancer. For women, breast cancer is the biggest killer and the third most punishing cancer in terms of healthy life lost.</p>
<p>Some say the study only included registered clinical trials in Australia which did not include unregistered trials. Compulsory registering of trials would allow better research and accurate database in terms of finding out which cancer type research needs further progress. Clinical trials are necessary and are essential in making a difference in survival rates for both men and women.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Adelaide Now, a recently published study in the Medical Journal of Australia suggests that four of the five cancers that result in the greatest health crisis seriously lack critical trials. The study examined lung, colorectal, prostate and pancreatic cancers.</p>
<p>Rachel Dear, MD and lead researcher of the study said that 386 recent interventional cancer trials in Australia did not include a lot of the major cancers. About 24 were conducted on lung cancer, which is a cancer with the greatest impact of quality of life and life expectancy. Colorectal cancer had 21 trials, even though it is second in terms of life expectancy.</p>
<p>The study found that breast cancer was the most researched type of cancer. The Cancer Council said that clinical research for all types of cancer is necessary in order to find the best way to improve treatment for patients. The council said that <a href="http://asbestoslaw.com/">lung cancer</a> was the biggest killer and the most easily prevented type of cancer, followed by colorectal cancer. For women, breast cancer is the biggest killer and the third most punishing cancer in terms of healthy life lost.</p>
<p>Some say the study only included registered clinical trials in Australia which did not include unregistered trials. Compulsory registering of trials would allow better research and accurate database in terms of finding out which cancer type research needs further progress. Clinical trials are necessary and are essential in making a difference in survival rates for both men and women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2011/04/study-finds-lack-of-clinical-trials-in-top-four-deadliest-cancers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Cancer Data Shows Lung Cancer Rates in Women Have Declined</title>
		<link>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2011/04/national-cancer-data-shows-lung-cancer-rates-in-women-have-declined/</link>
		<comments>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2011/04/national-cancer-data-shows-lung-cancer-rates-in-women-have-declined/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 13:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lung Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/?p=5191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to CNN, lung rates in women have fallen for the first time in a decade. A new report released by the National Cancer Institute showed that data collected through The American Cancer Society, The North American Association of Central Cancer Registries and the Center for Diseases Control and Prevention showed that <a href="http://asbestoslaw.com/">lung cancer</a> rates in women dropped significantly in time period of 2003-2007. This follows a long-term increase in lung cancer death rates in women for the past three decades.</p>
<p>The report found a significant decrease in cancer death rates for men and women since the early 1990s. However, death rates from liver cancer and melanoma in men, and liver and pancreatic cancer in women continue to increase.</p>
<p>The rate of new cancers, in both men and women, fell on average 1 percent a year, according to data collected. The percentage of prostate cancer cases has increased. Common cancers found in men such as lung, colorectal, oral, stomach and malignant tumors have decreased, while women saw decreases in breast, lung, colorectal, uterus, cervix, bladder and oral cavity cancers.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, pediatric cancer diagnosis have seen an increase in children from birth to 19 years of age.</p>
<p>It is gratifying to see some decline in overall cancer incidence and death rates in the United States. It shows that various methods for preventing, early detection and treatment has significantly improved. The American Association for Cancer Research calls the data remarkable, as it highlights the progress against cancer, and shows that increased knowledge, science, and advances in technology have done a lot to reduce incidence and mortality rates of cancer.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to CNN, lung rates in women have fallen for the first time in a decade. A new report released by the National Cancer Institute showed that data collected through The American Cancer Society, The North American Association of Central Cancer Registries and the Center for Diseases Control and Prevention showed that <a href="http://asbestoslaw.com/">lung cancer</a> rates in women dropped significantly in time period of 2003-2007. This follows a long-term increase in lung cancer death rates in women for the past three decades.</p>
<p>The report found a significant decrease in cancer death rates for men and women since the early 1990s. However, death rates from liver cancer and melanoma in men, and liver and pancreatic cancer in women continue to increase.</p>
<p>The rate of new cancers, in both men and women, fell on average 1 percent a year, according to data collected. The percentage of prostate cancer cases has increased. Common cancers found in men such as lung, colorectal, oral, stomach and malignant tumors have decreased, while women saw decreases in breast, lung, colorectal, uterus, cervix, bladder and oral cavity cancers.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, pediatric cancer diagnosis have seen an increase in children from birth to 19 years of age.</p>
<p>It is gratifying to see some decline in overall cancer incidence and death rates in the United States. It shows that various methods for preventing, early detection and treatment has significantly improved. The American Association for Cancer Research calls the data remarkable, as it highlights the progress against cancer, and shows that increased knowledge, science, and advances in technology have done a lot to reduce incidence and mortality rates of cancer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2011/04/national-cancer-data-shows-lung-cancer-rates-in-women-have-declined/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lung Cancer Drug Fails Advanced Late Stage Study</title>
		<link>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2011/03/lung-cancer-drug-fails-advanced-late-stage-study/</link>
		<comments>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2011/03/lung-cancer-drug-fails-advanced-late-stage-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lung Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[late stage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motesanib]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/?p=5198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to Fox News, a lung cancer drug motesanib has failed in a late-stage study. Amgen Inc. and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. announced the drug being developed by the companies has failed in a late-stage testing to improve overall survival rates for <a href="http://asbestoslaw.com/">lung cancer</a> patients. </p>
<p>The two companied developed motesanib for patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. Patients included in the study were receiving either a combination of the drug with chemotherapy or a placebo with chemotherapy. Squamous refers to the type of cancer cells from which the cancer originated.</p>
<p>The patients, as in earlier trials of motesanib, were also more likely to experience serious adverse events more frequently than those with a placebo. Some of the adverse events reported included hypertension and bleeding disorders.</p>
<p>The companies reported disappointment over motesanib failure, but plan to analyze the data closely in order to prepare for further research in the lung cancer area.</p>
<p>In 2008, another study involving the same drug was halted after early data showed higher mortality rates among patients receiving the drug. In 2009, the companies resumed the study with only non-squamous patients, as those patients are more likely to cough up blood during testing. Non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer affects about two-thirds of all non-small lung cancers. The company expected sales of motesanib to reach about $912 million by 2017.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Fox News, a lung cancer drug motesanib has failed in a late-stage study. Amgen Inc. and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. announced the drug being developed by the companies has failed in a late-stage testing to improve overall survival rates for <a href="http://asbestoslaw.com/">lung cancer</a> patients. </p>
<p>The two companied developed motesanib for patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. Patients included in the study were receiving either a combination of the drug with chemotherapy or a placebo with chemotherapy. Squamous refers to the type of cancer cells from which the cancer originated.</p>
<p>The patients, as in earlier trials of motesanib, were also more likely to experience serious adverse events more frequently than those with a placebo. Some of the adverse events reported included hypertension and bleeding disorders.</p>
<p>The companies reported disappointment over motesanib failure, but plan to analyze the data closely in order to prepare for further research in the lung cancer area.</p>
<p>In 2008, another study involving the same drug was halted after early data showed higher mortality rates among patients receiving the drug. In 2009, the companies resumed the study with only non-squamous patients, as those patients are more likely to cough up blood during testing. Non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer affects about two-thirds of all non-small lung cancers. The company expected sales of motesanib to reach about $912 million by 2017.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asbestoscancerblog.com/2011/03/lung-cancer-drug-fails-advanced-late-stage-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

